Some overdue love for the Parker 75 Laque fountain pen.

I have had this pen since 27 December 1986, bought at WHSmiths, Uxbridge. I know this because I still have the box with the Access card sales voucher, with the guarantee and care guide, folded up beneath the pen tray. So, that’s 37 years.

Parker 75 Laque fountain pen.

I wish I could say that during that time, the pen has been a constant companion, always to hand, faithful and dependable, travelling with me everywhere. But that would not be true. Certainly, that was the aim, but for some reason things did not work out and I never gelled with the pen.

A New Pen Day for me on 27/12/86.

As I still have my old diaries, I dug out my old 1986 volume to see whether I had written anything about the purchase. Sure enough, there was a line near the top of the page (after a reminder to watch the movie “Splash” at 8.30pm), which reads “See about Parker 75 Lacque (sic) £60!?” So, I was aware of the pen and its price and planned to give it another look. Perhaps I had seen it, possibly marked down in the post-Christmas sales.

My diary entry went on to say “I went to Uxbridge with Hilly (my sister) & bought the Parker 75 Laque fountain pen. Also got us an A4 size diary each and went in M&S & got some pre-faded jeans for £14.99! Pyjamas in Burtons where they were playing “If she knows what she wants” (Bangles).* My pen was an example of reality not matching up to the dream…grips in the wrong place & writes a little dry. Watched Splash with mum & felt a bit sad.”

Not much of a honeymoon period for the Parker then. I was already disappointed with it, the day I bought it. This sounds to me like an early case of buyer’s remorse.

A diary entry from 1986.

The pen cost me £60.00. This was quite a lot of money for me at the time, when I might have been accustomed to buying steel-nibbed Sheaffer No Nonsense pens for about one tenth of that amount. Indeed, a quick calculation in my diary recorded the meagre total of my savings at that time. Expectations for the pen costing 2.3% of my net worth, would have been high.

I see that I took an almost immediate dislike to the facets on the grip section (but not quite quick enough to stop me buying it). The pen was also quite small and slender, compared to what I had been used to.

It’s worth reminding ourselves that this was before the age of the internet, websites, YouTube reviews, nib-meisters and the interconnected global fountain pen community. This was 10 years before I possessed a PC. I was on my own, unless I wrote a letter to Parker (which I did once, to ask about an image used in one of their advertisements).

As I did not enjoy using the pen very much, it stayed in its box, largely untouched for the next 37 years.

Thinking back, I do not remember even being aware of the pen’s special and possibly unique feature for that time, namely that the nib and feed could be turned a few degrees to the left or to the right in the section, to alter the alignment of the facets in relation to the nib. Supposedly this was to help people, such as myself, who liked to rotate their pen (in my case, to the right) but then found that the symmetrical facets were no longer equidistant from the centre of the nib: you were left with thumb and finger resting on an uncomfortable sharp ridge.

Perhaps this innovation would have helped me. I simply cannot recall now whether I had tried experimenting with this facility and still not liked the pen, or whether I was completely unaware of the feature. I need to look back for any more references in my diaries.

On the rare occasions when I did get the pen out again, I noticed a little corrosion on the gold plated ring at the end of the section (called a “rust ring”). This did not help endear the pen to me.

It was only last year, when a friend wrote to me and mentioned the Parker 75 and its adjustable nib feature, that I remembered that I had one and got it out to try turning the nib. It is very easy. No tools are required. You just grip the nib and feed and twist them left or right, as desired.

Actually this is rather good.

The only other pen I know of now that had this feature, is a child’s beginner pen, the Stabilo EASYbirdy (not to be confused with the EASYbuddy which does not have this ability).

Last year was a year in which my enthusiasm for vintage Parker fountain pens flourished, helped by eBay and pen shows. I collected a number of Parker 17, 45 and 61 models as well as a Parker 51, all of which I enjoyed very much. I am glad to have a Parker 75 in this line-up.

One thing I have learned in recent years, is how to make some basic adjustments to a fountain pen nib, to make it write wetter or smoother, using a loupe, some brass shims, some micromesh pads and a bit of courage and/or recklessness. A few weeks ago, I got out my Parker 75 again. I spent a few minutes examining the nib and then eased the tines apart just a little, until a gap could be seen all the way to the tip. Then, checking that the tines were still aligned I tried writing with the pen once again. A few minutes’ effort had made a huge improvement. I found a suitable converter, filled the pen with Waterman Serenity Blue and have been enjoying it ever since. The medium nib now writes with a smooth, easy flow and has just a little softness too.

The tine gap after adjustment.

Better late than never. I no longer regret buying the pen, but only that I did not have the knowledge to tinker with the nib all those years ago. The main thing is that we are getting along again now. Feel free to reflect upon the lessons of this post, when you next hear Billy Joel singing “Turn the Lights Back On.”

*”If She Knew What She Wants” song, by The Bangles.

The distinctive nib of the Parker 75.

Inky pursuits: January 2024 round-up.

Inky pursuits is my series of occasional posts, gathering together some of my recent pen-related shenanigans which might not otherwise be blog-worthy stories on their own.

Duke 551 Confucius update.

This was my only new fountain pen acquisition in an otherwise dry January. I am enjoying it immensely although it takes a bit of getting used to. The size and weight are like nothing else in my pen cup. I love the look and feel of the natural bamboo wood of its barrel. I read in the Amazon description that this is Golden Silk Bamboo, whereas the Duke 552 is said to use Golden Stripe Bamboo which looks darker and more exotic.

I need to correct one statement made in my recent early thoughts post on the 551, where I said “It is not a zoom nib and there is not an easy way to get a medium width line between these two extremes.” With a little experimenting, I found that by lowering the angle at which I hold the pen it is actually very simple to get progressively broader lines, until you end up with the entire flat part of the nib on the paper, giving a line about 4mm thick. It can fill a row, in my Stalogy 4mm grid paper journal. Also, the twin slits/three tines nib ensures that the flow keeps up with demand: even when repeatedly laying down lines of the maximum width.

A sample of line widths from this fude nib.

Montegrappa Blue Black ink.

The pen drew much interest when I brought it along to our January pen club meet. I was asked about the ink in it, Montegrappa Blue Black. I had bought a bottle in Selfridges in 2018, when buying my Montegrappa Fortuna:(that was a good day!). I had not used the ink much, feeling that the colour was a bit light, and preferring my Diamine Tavy blue black. Now, six years on, I find myself liking the Montegrappa ink more and am glad to have kept it. Unfortunately, it appears no longer available as I have not been able to find any online. However there will no doubt be many close equivalents from other brands.

Montegrappa Blue Black ink.

The London Fountaineers pen club.

As mentioned, we had a monthly meet up recently. As always, I got to try lots of different pens and inks. Looking back at my notebook, one of the stand-out pens for me was a Pilot Custom 743 with a number 15 size “SU” (stub) nib, in 14k gold. It was Bryan’s pen and was inked with Yama-budo (I think: I didn’t write that down) and felt absolutely lovely, being very narrow for a stub, and highly enjoyable for ordinary writing.

Having said that, I am still very pleased with my new Pilot Custom Heritage 912 with its number 10 size Waverly nib. As a reliable pen, with a fine nib, loaded with a blue black ink (Pilot) with some water-resistance and a nib that copes with all types of paper and writing styles, it is a very useful tool.

One of my pen club friends, a former calligrapher, gave me a huge stash of William Mitchell dip nibs, all left-foot obliques but in a variety of widths. There must have been over a hundred of them. She also gave me a couple of mapping pens – very fine dip pens, with the nib fixed in a plastic housing which can be removed from the holder and put back the opposite way around, for ease of carrying. I had never seen one before. They will be great to include with a travel kit. I am most grateful!

A hoard of oblique nibs comes my way!

One of the ladies, Kim, brought along an old Parker 45 that she had been given, that was hard-starting and blobbing. I disassembled the nib and feed and was able to replace them in better alignment, which I hope was all it needed. The pen filled ok, with her Waterman Mysterious blue. I was able to give her the good news that her nib, which she had thought was steel, was actually 14k gold and that the “X” on the underside of the housing signified “extra fine”.

Inkcoming.

Whilst in Central London to accompany my wife on some errands recently, we made a short detour to the lovely Choosing Keeping, where I bought two bottles of Pilot Iroshizuku ink, in syo-ro and asa-gao, both of which had been on my radar for some time. I also picked up a couple of boxes of Kaweco cartridges (Ruby Red and Smokey Grey), this being one of the few places in know of in London where you can buy such things. Ruby Red lives permanently in my Online Campus Fluffy Cat pen.

Two inks from Choosing Keeping.

Mark Twain goes Titanium.

In March 2023 at the London spring pen show, I bought a Conklin Mark Twain Crescent Filler, in black with rose gold fittings and a black-coated nib. Unfortunately the nib proved rather too wet for my liking and I did not succeed in adjusting it much. At a recent pen show, I had bought a Titanium nib set in an ebonite housing and feed. The housing was not compatible with the Conklin unfortunately and I could not find any other pen that it would fit and so it sat idle.

That is, until last week. I decided (just around midnight when I should be going to bed) that I could extract the Titanium nib from its housing and swap it into the Conklin. Removing the two nibs to carry out the transplant, proved harder than I had expected as they were both VERY tight in their housings. I had to resort to gripping the housings with pliers (copiously wrapped in kitchen towel) and at last they came out.

I was able to use this Titanium nib, but not the feed and housing.

I was rewarded with a much improved writing experience with the Conklin. I filled it with Parker Quink Black. I am using it as my journaling pen for February. The only slight issue is that the shoulders of the nib just touch the sides when I screw the cap on. However this is only slight and the nib seems un-affected. I could try bending the shoulders in but fear that it would risk distorting the tines or ruining the nib’s symmetry and so I will leave it alone.

I am much happier with the Conklin now.

All in all, the year finds me with a deep sense of gratitude, for the joy of this hobby and the friendships that it brings. Recently, I cleaned two large batches of pens and reduced my currently inked number to twelve. Right now, I want for nothing more in my pen collection and so a dry February looks on the cards. I cannot make any promises when the pen show comes to town in March, but it is good to keep an open mind.